Syrian Vice President Farouk al-Sharaa promised last week that
Syria's response would be forthcoming to avenge Damascus' humiliation
by the alleged Israeli air incursion into its airspace. Dr Boaz
Ganor, executive director of the International Policy Institute
for Counter-Terrorism (ICT) in Herzliya, has commented on the
various options, that President Bashar Assad has in store. Ganor:
"The Syrians have a variety of possibilities to operate against
Israel, from urging Hezbollah to heat up the northern border through
one action or revert to high-trajectory fire directed at Israeli
targets." In fact, the Israeli defense establishment does
not rule out a Syrian attempt to respond sometime with missile
fire and has already taken precautionary measures to meet this
threat.
So are Israel and Syria edging closer to war? Tension between the
two longtime enemies has increased substantially and the recent
incident may well become the trigger for a full-scale conflict of
some kind. One thing is quite certain, Syria sees the next war with
Israel involving missile attacks on civilian infrastructure, an
anonymous senior official in the Damascus Ministry of Defense, warned
recently. Fully aware of Israel's military superiority, especially
it air force, the Syrian military prefers to avoid a direct, classic
warfare confrontation with the IDF, in which it may well fare even
worse than in the 1973 Yom Kippur War. Instead, the next war will
involve Katyusha rockets and ballistic missiles that will target
strategic points in Israel, and escalate dangerously into a full-scale
city war.
According to Arab affairs expert Dr Guy Bechor, the Syrian assessment
is a result of the Second Lebanon War. After that war, the Syrians
understood that they do not need a large ground force to defeat
Israel, but rather missiles aimed at dense Israeli population centers.
Indeed, for the past two years the Syrians have been engaged in
massive acquisitions from Russia, after an $11 billion debt was
partially forgiven by Russia in 2005, and mainly through a tab taken
on by Iran's president Ahmadinejad.
One of the worst case scenarios facing the Israeli defense community,
in its short-term assessment period is Syria's chemical weapons
potential, combined with its medium-range missile arsenal. (see
defense-update analysis Syrian
Ballistic Missile Arsenal by the author).
The Syrian Chemical Warfare Potential
Syrian chemical weapons development has been largely spurred by
its disastrous conventional military defeats by Israel in 1967,
1973, and 1982. Syrian President Hafez al-Assad was Minister of
Defense during the 1967 Six-Day War, during which the Golan Heights
were captured by Israeli forces. After seizing power and assuming
the presidency in 1971, Assad sought to bolster Syria's strategic
capabilities by pursuing the development of chemical weapons and
ballistic missile delivery systems. After Syria's air force was
routed by Israeli jet fighters in 1982, losing 86 planes in a single
engagement over the Bekaa valley in Lebanon, Syria apparently decided
that surface-to-surface missiles could counter Israel’s air
superiority. From a strategic perspective, long-range missiles such
as the Scud could offer a means to deliver chemical weapons in response
to Israel’s nuclear threat.
For
several decades, Israeli intelligence has monitored Syria's clandestine
efforts to reach strategic parity with Israel's military potential.
Fully aware of Israel's unchallenged air superiority, Syria opted
for missiles, but while these could reach into Israel, strategic
effect could only be achieved by weapons of mass destruction, arming
ballistic missile warheads. Realistic assessment ruled out Syria's
potential in developing nuclear capability in foreseen time, and
although efforts were made to develop bio-weapons, Syria's national
emphasis during the last two decades has been devoted to chemical
weapons.
The first to start this trend, was Abdullah Watiq Shahid, a nuclear
physicist, who founded the government funded Scientific Studies
and Research Center (SSRC) in 1971, ostensibly a civilian science
agency, but soon operating under the cloak of high secrecy in developing
weaponized chemical substances. The first facility, which started
producing such material, was named the Borosilicate Glass Project,
established with aid from a German company. The facility produced
dual-purpose chemicals, such as dichloro ( 2- chlorovinyl) arsine,
a substance which is the main source of the GB Sarin-A nerve agent.
Another company named Setma sprung up in the outskirts of Damascus,
which imported trimethyl phosphate from India, under the pretense
to produce organophosphate insecticide for Syrian agriculture purposes.
This substance, experts know, is a precursor for the weaponization
of nerve agents.
A more ambitious program was started during the eighties, when
Syria's military patrons, the Soviet Union rendered vital information
over the production process of advanced chemical warfare weapons.
This brought about the development of aerial bombs containing binary
sarin gas. The Syrians modified the Russian Zab - 2.5 incendiary
shells to include chemical warheads, using DF and isopropyl alcohol
substances in a binary system.
The binary projectile usually contains 2 separate, hermetically
sealed, plastic-lined containers fitted one behind the other in
the body of the projectile. In the sarin (GB) binary weapon, the
forward canister contains methylphosphonic difluoride (DF). The
rear canister contains isopropyl alcohol and isopropylamine solution
(OPA). For safety storage, only the forward canister is in the munition
prior to use. Before firing, the rear canister is added and the
fuse is placed. The launching forces cause the canisters to break,
thus producing GB within the projectile.
During the nineties, the Syrians explored new ways to develop chemical
warheads of even more lethal capability. They used the ex-Soviet
aerial cluster bomb PTAB-500 to modify its warhead to carry chemical
weapons load.
But a real strategic nature breakthrough was achieved when Syrian
scientists started to develop the notorious weaponization grade
VX substance. VX, known under the chemical name O-ethyl-S-(2-isopropylaminoethyl)
methyl phosphonothiolate rates among the most potent chemical weapons
in the world. It has a high persistence and is life threatening
when inhaled through the human respiratory system and penetrates
the skin, with deadly effect. Israeli intelligence has long monitored
activities in suspected VX production facilities near Hama and Homs
in northern Syria.
According
to intelligence reports, Syrian air force have carried out a live
chemical weapons bombing test in October 1999, when a MiG-23 jet
dropped a bomb filled with an unidentified chemical weapons agent
on a practice range. The test was detected by US spy satellites,
which identified distinct coloration on the impact area, indicating
a chemical explosion. According to intelligence estimates, Syria's
strategic chemical weapons stockpile is still primarily composed
of the nerve agent sarin. However, latest reports indicate that
Syria has successfully produced the much more persistent nerve agent
VX and that it may have tested missile warheads armed with VX.
In
a study prepared by Dr Danny Shoham, a leading Israeli expert on
chemical biological warfare, he explained that by using a combination
of volatile (i.e., sarin) and more persistent agents (i.e., mustard,
VX), Syria has the capability of utilizing CW in very different
tactical scenarios. Sarin is extremely deadly, but it evaporates
about as rapidly as water. An attack using this agent could inflict
high casualties near a battlefront, but because it dissipates quickly
it could permit an attacking force to seize territory without major
risk to its own troops.
A Syrian attack to retake the Golan Heights might include the use
of sarin munitions (although it should be noted that Israeli troops
deployed in the area are equipped with advanced chemical defense
suites suitable for such a contingency.) Compared to VX nerve agent,
sarin is also relatively easy to disseminate.
Due to its viscous nature, VX requires some sort of aerosolization.
However, VX could be most effective in attacking an adversary's
rear areas, including military installations and logistical networks
such as airports and train stations. Most people whose skin comes
into contact with as little as one drop of VX will die, unless they
receive very swift medical intervention. Furthermore, Dr Shoham
warns, that VX nerve agent would remain hazardous for at least several
days, requiring labor-intensive and time-consuming decontamination
procedures.
The reliable German newspaper Die Welt reported in September 2004
that Syrian special forces held maneuvers with Sudani Government
forces experimenting with chemical weapons of Syrian origin. According
to the Welt report, in its original German language version, it
was proposed that the arms be tested on the rebel SPLA, the Sudan
People's Liberation Army, in the south. Injuries caused by chemical
arms were found on the bodies of the victims, according to unnamed
sources quoted by the German daily Die Welt newspaper and witnesses
who talked with the Arab news ILAF last month. Several frozen bodies
arrived suddenly at the "Al-Fashr Hospital" in the Sudanese
capital Khartoum in June that year. Die Welt claimed to have documents
from Western intelligence agencies, concluding that an exercise
in chemical warfare had indeed taken place. The reports, which had
spread all over the global media in 2004, although vehemently denied,
proved extremely embarrassing to Bashar Assad's Alawite regime,
at it was well known that Syria had already established the most
deadly chemical warfare arsenal in the Middle East.
According to western intelligence sources based on information
from inside Syria, a test with chemical weapons aerial delivery
was staged by a special Syrian air force unit at its base near Homs.
Strangely the test was made on July 11, 2006 just one day before
the attacks by Hezbollah on Israel's border, which triggered the
Second Lebanon War. According to the reports, the tests involved
the delivery of Sarin and VX through Syria's Scud missile arsenal
(Scud-B and Scud-C) produced in Syria with the help of North Korea.
The deadly effect of the chemical warfare agents produced at the
el-Safir military complex near Haleb (Allepo) was demonstrated on
the night of July 25, 2007, apparently by an accident, which happened
while Syrian engineers working on a Scud C warhead. 15 syrians were
reportedly killed in the explosion that, according to official Syrian
sources, was caused by sympathetic explosion due to an uncommon
summer heat wave (the event happened at night, when the temperature
is relaively low). According to Janes Defense Weekly, the casualties
also included Iranian experts that were present at the site. According
to Jane's, sarin and VX agents were dispersed over a large area
after the accidents, causing severe burns. Al-Safir
chemical warfare complex (right, marked in green) and the Kafr Aakkar
missile base (left, marked in light blue). An SA-2 missile is seen
on the far right (marked in red)