Return to current Issue
Back Issues (1-04, 2-04, 3-04, 4-04)

 Topics & Features:

  Armored Fighting Vehicles
  C4ISR
  Combat Aircraft
  Electronic Warfare
  Fire Support
  Future Combat Systems
  Homeland Defense
  Infantry Warfare
  Logistics & support
  Naval Systems
  Net Centric Warfare
  Precision Strike
  Protection & Survivability
  Spec-Ops, Counter Terror
  Unmanned Systems
  Defense Exhibitions

  RSS News Feed
 


 

 Relevant links:

  Miniature Aerial Vehicles

  Convoy escort by UAV

 

 MAV Links

  Casper 200
  Desert Hawk
  Dragon Eyes
  FanTail

  GoldenEye-50

  I-See

  iSTAR

  Pointer

  Seagull

  Skylark (Elbit)

  Skylark (RAFAEL)


MAV - Combat Lessons Learned

Dragon Eye Miniature Aerial Vehicles were operated in operation Iraqi Freedom (OIF) throughout the war, flying mostly over flat, open desert, small towns, and cities and over the edges of Baghdad. Many missions successfully countered windy and sandy conditions. Most flights were unplanned, responding to opportunities and specific tactical requirements. Some missions were planned but not executed due to the rapid operational tempo. The majority of units kept Dragon Eye as a battalion asset with missions tasked by the battalion commander, intelligence officer, or higher command level. Only one unit used Dragon Eye at the company-level. This unit used Dragon Eye the least, as the company commander was too busy with his missions and did not have the staff and specialists to support UAV tasking plans. The most proficient operators for the MAV systems were those with prior intelligence or reconnaissance background, as they had  experience in analyzing and reporting what they could see in real time. Dragon Eye units coordinated flights with the battalion air officer or company forward air controller. Coordination included the determination of maximum altitude, keeping to one side of a particular road etc. 

Among the missions flown by Dragon Eyes during OIF were point and area reconnaissance, confirmation of other intelligence sources, survey of city area, before the entry of forces, reconnaissance of bridges and routes, supporting mounted and foot patrols, identification of suspected enemy forces, to eliminate fratricide, battle damage assessment and force protection for convoys. The sensors used proved effective for showing people, vehicles, tanks, APCs and guard posts. However, these sensors could not identify people, except by their actions or tell if they were armed, find what effect friendly artillery had on an enemy position, or classify some vehicle types.

 


Search Defense Update:


ByGoogle

 


   Become a member
   Advertise on this page
   Send suggestions...

   Commentary


 

  Updated: 11/28/2004

   

 

2002-2005 All Rights Reserved

 Contact us - Advertise - Terms of use