|

Return to current Issue
Back Issues: 1-04, 2-04,
3-04, 4-04,
1-05, 2-05,
3-05, 1-06
Topics & Features:
Armored Fighting Vehicles
C4ISR / Wireless
Networking
Combat Aircraft
Electronic Warfare
Fire Support
Future Combat Systems
Homeland Defense
Infantry / Urban Warfare
Logistics & support
Naval Systems
Net Centric Warfare
Precision Strike
Protection & Survivability
Spec-Ops, Counter Terror
Training and
Simulation
Unmanned Systems
Defense Exhibitions
RSS News Feed

|
Vehicle Protection Concepts
Page 1 out of 4 in this article
(Next)
|
During the conflict in Kosovo and more recently in Afghanistan and Iraq, it
became clear that soft, unprotected vehicles became primary targets
for guerilla attacks. These vehicles are highly vulnerable to any
type of attack - mines, Improvised Explosive Devices (IED),
firebombs, grenades, small arms or mortar fire and especially RPG.
While US and French forces confronted highly determined guerilla
forces in Algeria and Indo-China (Vietnam), lack of recent
experience left most of the western armies and peacekeeping forces
unprotected against such highly lethal threats. The painful
experience NATO forces encountered from mines in Bosnia identified
the need to equip the patrol, command and supply vehicles with
effective counter-mine capability. The results were evolutionary
developments of the M1114 up-armored Humvees, and the protected patrol
vehicle (PVP), which was later transformed into the
Dingo (German
Army) and the MLV/LMV (British and Italian forces). These vehicles
are
offering better protection, and were considered to be used to
lead and protect convoys and as patrol vehicles. Adequate to lead
and provide convoy security and acting as light combat patrol
vehicles.
Next |
|
|